What are the facts?

    People who were
    actually there in 1990/91

 :: Joe Zamora's Letter ::
 :: Frogg Excavation's Letter ::
 :: Bill Vezzoso's Letter ::
 :: Bruce Hammer's Letter ::
 :: Judge Gannett's Testimony ::

    Transcripts and Docs
 :: Original 1990 Citation ::
 :: Feb 5th Vezzoso Response ::
 :: Feb 5th Vezzoso Powerpoint ::
 :: Feb 5th BOCC Transcripts ::
 :: Mar 12th BOCC Transcripts ::
 :: BOA Transcripts ::
 :: Zoning Resolution of 1978 ::

    GarCo's Arguments
 :: GarCo's Arguments ::

 :: Mike Kennedy's
    "Anonymous" Letter &     Enforcement Notification
    and Letters from
    Ron VanMeter
::
     (Which Mike Kennedy Admitted
     at the BOA hearing P123 L4)


Sign the Petition

 :: Home Page

 :: "Trési Houpt has no
   respect for her oath of
   office" - A better picture
   emerges

 :: State Sen. Greg Brophy
  was concerned that
  Trési Houpt
  wouldn't be a true
  representative of local
  government

 :: Republican county
  commissioner candidate
  Steve Reynolds accused
  Trési Houpt of obstructing
  the business of the
  commission

 :: The county says that
  several witnesses "rebutted
  testimony" of our 5 people
  who were there or who this
  actually happened to. Here's
  the proof of the truth, again.

 :: POST INDEPENDENT
- Silenced YOUR voices!
- May 15, 2008

 :: Bill Vezzoso Jr.'s
    Letter to the Editor

    'Thursday's Article Silenced
    100+ voices'

 :: PROOF of the TRUTH Article

 :: Aspen Daily News Article

 :: Have a problem with GarCo?
    Have a problem with unfair or unjust
    treatment, email us and we'll post it here.

 :: Want to Help More?

 :: Printable stopGARCO
 :: business cards


 :: Printable PDF Petition
-  Collect signatures on paper and then
-  fax completed petitions to 970-963-5975

  Sign the Petition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BREAKING NEWS 5/17/08:

"METHOD OF HARASSMENT"

stopGARCOinjustice.com has received pictures of rock rushing, material processing, and storage of natural resources in the exact same area of the Vezzoso's. stopGARCOinjustice.com wonders does everyone need a materials permit for a pile of dirt, or a grading permit every time you use a backhoe and dump truck. Remember, these permits cost $150 to $400, a site plan, and a soils report which is a lot more money. From GarCo's federal court documents, they wanted Mr. Vezzoso only to be allowed ONE pickup full of top soil. Do you have more than a pickup load of soil? Do you need a permit to garden in Garfield County? This means any excavator in Garfield county can't simply dump a pile of dirt at a jobsite and pick it up later, they'll need a permit, soils report, completed application, and a fee for each and every place a backhoe, bobcat, dump truck, and heavy equipment used in Garfield County, giving them the power to harass some people and ignore others with the excuse of "we have to be informed of a violation to do anything" but can terrorize any excavation company that Trési Houpt, Larry McCown, and John Martin so choose. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.

May.17.2008 May.17.2008 May.17.2008
Taken from the bike path from the 100 road outside of Carbondale. Sent in by an anonymous email to www.stopGARCOinjustice.com. This is a FinTec 542 track crusher changing the state of the materials. Do they have a material processing permit because they are changing the state by crushed rock? As this is the definition of material processing under the code (Section 2.02.31), we think they SHOULD have a permit.

Taken from near the 100 road, large piles of dirt. This is the same type of dirt pile photographed in the "anonymous" against the Vezzoso's that prompted the actions of Garfield County. Do they have a special use permit or are they "violation" of storing natural resources? Since the code actually says:

natural resource; examples include petroleum refining, oil shale crushing, retorting and refining, ore smelting, coal crushing and cleaning, saw mills, alfalfa pellet mills, food canning or packing, creation of glass, ceramic or plastic materials, gravel crushing, cement manufacture; concrete batch plants;

So we don't think they need a permit, but GarCo does. We wonder if they have one? We'll just have to find out.

Taken from the bike path, a clear use of an extractor and what the county calls material processing and grading. The difference here, is that someone REALLY is crushing rock and processing materials, not screening top soil to reclaim their Ag pasture. Do they have a permit for processing natural materials and grading? Are they in "violation" of processing natural resources and grading without an SUP? Or do they need a material's handling permit? Or all three?

Since the code says:
including a transfer station for construction waste
including: wood, drywall, metals, paper, plastic and other types of construction materials

We don't think they need a material handling permit, because of what the code defines through definitions as natural resources. Since they're not grading they shouldn't need a grading permit, right? As far as GarCo's concerned, ANY excavation needs a grading permit - even it's it's not actually grading. Be careful excavators, they can terrorize anyone they want. And seriously, you might be next. Let's stop this harassment, sign the petition today.

 

 




.